Coming clean: Drug and alcohol testing in the workplace

Drug testing in the workplace is a comparatively new situation that is observed to exist globally, relocating all around companies operating in developing countries. Others state authoritatively that it should be carried out because it is a practical way of controlling drug abuse in the workplace. Arguments occur in the workplace drug testing. The problems cover from privacy questions to duty every individual has to perform. This topic is to be covered with questions like whether examination results exactly serve an indication of substance abuse in the workplace or if they primarily manifest activities outside of the workplace.

The initial debate in favor of Workplace Drug Testing involves most to “safety-critical” business occupations like medicine, transport and construction where disabled senses and discrimination can have impactful outcomes. In addition, advocates of Workplace Drug Testing claim that employers have a “duty of care” to produce a secure working environment.

The justification and opposition are immeasurable. Oppositions of the benefit of Workplace Drug Testing do not argue that it can display only use instead of the influence of presentation, nor can it recognize between use and abuse. Workplace Drug Testing lifts a variety of moral concerns, including the privacy of personal information and whether an employer has a freedom to know what employees do outside of working hours. Moreover, Workplace Drug Testing is not totally reliable, resulting rare “false positives”.

R. Soriano