Illegal logging cuts down birds by 50%

According to the recent study, Illegal logging for lumber destroys the habitat of birds which decreased by fifty percent in the forests of Ghana.

Researchers found that the rate of legal and illegal logging reached to over six hundred percent between the year 1995 and 2010 which is six times bigger than the great sustainable level. The species of birds are very much affected which already decreased in number. The habitat of birds didn’t have a significant improvement after the illegal logging operations.

Tropical forests are place to many of the earthly variety of life or ecosystem compared to any other natural environment of plants, animals or organisms but these forests are already in danger because of the illegal logging. However, its influence on tropical forests has not been measured yet.

Based on the reports, about fifty to ninety percent of lumber were taken in many tropical areas which had a major impact in destroying the forest in the world. In Ghana, almost eighty percent of lumber were taken which is illegal.

For this reason that the rate of illegal logging reported in Ghana are normal of many tropical growing countries, the researchers think that these movements are also existing in tropical forest of other countries and should be given enough attention.

S. Varma

MHB

An island found in the province of Aklan, Philippines—famous for its white sand and clear blue water has been a popular tourist destination ever since its beaches have been opened to the public.

But the pristine beach we all know could take a turn for the worst in a few years.

Although its waters are still clear and the sand is still powdery-white, most of the tourists and locals do not seem to be taking the upkeep of the island seriously. Some of the beaches already have moss teeming along the edges of the water—a sign that bacteria thrives along the surrounding area, making the waters an easy target for pollution.

Several stores and restaurants, because of the lack of solid waste management in Aklan (although, in early 2013, the government has started a solid waste management team in some parts of the province), result to throwing their trash in the ocean—and, going back to high school biology, is a terrible thing to do as it would affect the wildlife teeming in the ocean’s waters.

 But of course, like all bad things, this could be stopped.

The whole “Save the environment” theme has been more or less cliché, but it is still a fact that we have to do something about our surroundings or the future generation wouldn’t have much to appreciate later on. Our oceans are our gems—and we must do everything we can to protect it; not only Boracay, but also all the other beaches around the world.

First of all, restaurants and establishments aren’t really bad things—in fact, they help raise the country’s tourism and provide livelihood for the locals. But they must observe proper disposal of their trash instead of throwing them into the ocean. They must remember that the ocean is a healthy place for living creatures—both mankind, animals and plants—to thrive in, and it is not a huge, living waste dump.

Second, everyone who comes in and out of beaches—may they be tourists or locals— must always respect the land they step on by, quoting the Baltimore Grotto (a caving society), “taking nothing but pictures, leaving nothing but footprints and killing nothing but time”.

And last, but not the least—we should all go the extra mile to promote the welfare of our environment. With this, hopefully, the future generation would still have something to be proud of.

(Source: http://qwekqwek.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSC03041-600×338.jpg)

In a closed room, all that one could see were people hugging each other tightly, releasing out cries of joy or holding out old photographs beside one another. To almost everyone in the room, now was the time for happiness. Separated for about sixty years, this was the first time ever since to come across with one another. While everyone else enjoyed their hours of reunifying with their loved ones, one person was shedding tears, looking into her old photograph and into a young man standing in front of her. Eighty year old Kim Sun Yeon was unable to find her sister she was supposed to meet today at the reunion, instead was faced with the news of her sister’s death from her sister’s son. If the reunion took place several months ago as it was supposed to, Kim would’ve been able to reunite with her sister.

Following the division of Korean peninsula in 1945, thousands of Koreans had to be separated from their loved ones and have not come across with each other ever since. Taking these separated family members’ desperate wishes of reunion into consideration, the two Korean governments agreed on holding periodical reunions between the separated families. This emotional and humane event, however, later took on the form of a political threat between the two countries, completely losing its purpose of reuniting the families. It is now crucial for both Korean governments to cooperate with each other to hold more family reunions, rather than to force their political beliefs upon this intractable issue.

North Korea has demonstrated its political strategy during the supposed family reunion in September 2013. By then, the reunion involved about 100 families from each country. However, North Korea decided to cancel the reunion just four days before the scheduled date, justifying their action by stating how “it does not make sense to carry out the reunion of families who were separated due to the war during the dangerous nuclear war practice” (CNN, 6 Feb 2014). What the North referred to as the “nuclear war practice” was the annual U.S.-South Korea joint military drill.

President Park of South Korea  has maintained a tough stance on North Korea. Under her new policy of “trustpolitik,” Park has announced “rewards” for North Korea only if it takes actions that earn South Korea’s trust and appreciation. For example, even when North Korea demanded the South Korean government to stop the joint military drill with the U.S, Park continued the scheduled drill.

With both countries insisting on continuing their strategies concerning family reunions – the North using them as  a bargaining tool and the South never seeking to cooperate with the North – it has become nearly impossible to hold stable family reunions in the future.

Given this situation, the two governments should cooperate with each other to find a middle ground, a solution that both Koreas can agree on. In order to do so, North Korea must see the humanitarian and emotional side of the issue. For South Korea, President Park should take a softer stance. If the current tension between the two countries continues, there may be no additional reunions.

Although the Korean Peninsula remains divided, the bond and relationship the people share across the border should not be ignored. Both governments must find a way to cooperate with each other and address this urgent need for the benefit of their own people. If both take action to instill greater trust in each other, then a “peaceful ending” between the two countries – something everyone is looking forward to – may even be possible in the near future.

I. Kim